Prediction of Shandra Livingston vs Ruth Seeman Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
S. Livingston vs R. Seeman

Shandra Livingston

USA

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

236

Best Rank

212

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Ruth Seeman

NZL

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

236

Best Rank

212

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Livingston 1 - 1 Seeman

They have played 5 sets in total, with Shandra Livingston winning 3 and Ruth Seeman winning 2. The last match between Shandra Livingston and Ruth Seeman was at the Chatham CH, 04-08-1986, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Shandra Livingston getting the victory 6-3 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Livingston	1
Seeman	1

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R4) Chatham CH(08-04-86)

Stats

Shandra Livingston

Ruth Seeman

(R4) Midland CH(07-14-86)

Stats

Ruth Seeman

Shandra Livingston

S. Livingston vs R. Seeman H2H Profile

S. Livingston	Stats	R. Seeman
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
54.84% (51-42)	Career Total W/L	49.65% (70-71)
1	Hard	1
0	Titles	1
1	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

S. Livingston vs R. Seeman Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Shandra Livingston has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Ruth Seeman has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Shandra Livingston, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ruth Seeman has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Shandra Livingston has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ruth Seeman has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Shandra Livingston has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Ruth Seeman winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Shandra Livingston has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 64% (W/L 7/4), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/3). Ruth Seeman has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 64% (W/L 11/9), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 38% (W/L 5/8).
Player level: In the last year, Shandra Livingston has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Ruth Seeman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Shandra Livingston winning 1 times and Ruth Seeman being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Shandra Livingston winning 3 and Ruth Seeman winning 2.
The last match between Shandra Livingston and Ruth Seeman was at the Chatham CH, 04-08-1986, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Shandra Livingston getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Shandra Livingston has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Ruth Seeman has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Shandra Livingston has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ruth Seeman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Shandra Livingston has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ruth Seeman has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Shandra Livingston vs Ruth Seeman Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

S. Livingston vs R. Seeman H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

S. Livingston	Stats	R. Seeman
1	H2H Matches Won	1
3	Sets Won	2
25	Games Won	19
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
50% (1/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	50% (1/2)
0% (0/1)	Deciding Set Win %	100% (1/1)
50% (1/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
50% (1/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	50% (1/2)

Recent Performance Stats

S. Livingston Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
ITF Helsinki - 23-01-1989
R3 Sofie AlbinusS. Albinus	L	6-1 6-2	Stats
ITF Corpus Christi - 03-10-1988
R3 Eleni RossidesE. Rossides	L	4-6 6-1 6-1	Stats
ITF Chatham - 15-08-1988
Nana SmithN. Smith	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
R3 Deborah MoringelloD. Moringello	W	6-3 6-0	Stats
R4 Lisa BobbyL. Bobby	W	6-2 6-3	Stats

View All

R. Seeman Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Wellington - 04-02-1991
Q3 Miriam OremansM. Oremans	L	6-0 6-1	Stats
Q2 Stacey SchefflinS. Schefflin	W	6-2 0-1 RET	Stats
Q1 Ann DevriesA. Devries	W	6-3 6-1	Stats
Auckland - 28-01-1991
Q1 Petra SchwarzP. Schwarz	L	6-3 3-6 6-3	Stats
ITF Milan - 23-07-1990
R3 Magdalena SimkovaM. Simkova	L	6-3 7-6	Stats

View All

S. Livingston vs R. Seeman Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

S. Livingston	Stats	R. Seeman
54.84% (51/42)	YTD Win/Loss	49.65% (70/71)
54.81% (114/94)	Sets Win/Loss	48.92% (158/165)
51.58% (914/858)	Games Win/Loss	50.08% (1474/1469)
55.70% (44/35)	Hard Win/Loss	49.25% (33/34)
0.00% (0/3)	Clay Win/Loss	52.78% (19/17)
0% (0/0)	Indoor Hard W/L	40.00% (2/3)
0% (0/0)	Grass Win/Loss	55.00% (11/9)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
360.65	Average Opponent Rank	415.16
0% (0/0)	Slam W/L	66.67% (2/1)
55.84% (43/34)	Challenger W/L	54.55% (42/35)
0.00% (0/1)	Futures W/L	16.67% (1/5)
55% (51/93)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	49% (66/135)
40% (2/5)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	22% (2/9)
45% (10/22)	Deciding Set Win %	50% (25/50)
88% (56/49)	1st Set Won, Won Match	78% (65/51)
13% (56/7)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	20% (65/13)
5% (37/2)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	21% (73/15)